Skip to content

Bench Record

Gilpin County · 2026 retention ballot

Each judge’s percentile among all 2026 judges at the same court level statewide. Lowest quarter is outlined.

Statewide · Supreme Court and Court of Appeals

Rebecca Rankin Freyre Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 1 of 7 · statewide 1 of 108 3.90survey grade27 responses4th most of 7

Pax Moultrie Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 2 of 7 · statewide 3 of 108 3.80survey grade36 responses1st most of 7

Katharine E. Lum Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 3 of 7 · statewide 5 of 108 3.80survey grade25 responses6th most of 7

Elizabeth L. Harris Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 4 of 7 · statewide 8 of 108 3.60survey grade27 responses4th most of 7

Karl L. Schock Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 5 of 7 · statewide 17 of 108 3.60survey grade28 responses3rd most of 7

William W. Hood III Supreme Court · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 7 of 7 · statewide 51 of 108 3.60survey grade31 responses2nd most of 7

Grant Sullivan Court of Appeals · Statewide Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 6 of 7 · statewide 52 of 108 3.70survey grade19 responses7th most of 7

1st Judicial District · District Court

Andrew C. Poland District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (9–0) Rank 2 of 65 · statewide 9 of 108 3.60survey grade28 responses60th percentile

Ryan P. Loewer District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (10–0) Rank 18 of 65 · statewide 30 of 108 3.50survey grade47 responses93rd percentile

Christopher C. Zenisek District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (10–0) Rank 27 of 65 · statewide 48 of 108 3.40survey grade44 responses87th percentile

Tamara S. Russell District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (10–0) Rank 42 of 65 · statewide 74 of 108 3.10survey grade24 responses42nd percentile

Christopher Rhamey District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (9–0) Weakest: attorneys “meets” 67.00% (13th percentile) Rank 50 of 65 · statewide 84 of 108 3.00survey grade51 responses95th percentile

Meegan Miloud District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (10–0) Weakest: survey grade 2.70 (15th percentile) Rank 59 of 65 · statewide 99 of 108 2.70survey grade24 responses42nd percentile

Chantel E. Contiguglia District Court · 1st Judicial District Commission: meets standards (10–0) Weakest: category mean 2.55 (4th percentile) Rank 64 of 65 · statewide 105 of 108 2.60survey grade42 responses83rd percentile

Gilpin County Court

Timothy Lane County Court · Gilpin County Commission: meets standards (10–0) Rank 19 of 36 · statewide 59 of 108 3.10survey grade12 responses9th percentile

This ballot at a glance

Judges on your ballot: 15
In the bottom quarter of peers: 3
Commission said “does not meet”: 0
Commission vote was split: 0
No survey published: 0

Reading a row

The big number is the judge’s percentile among 2026 judges at the same court level. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals judges form groups too small for a percentile, so their big number is their percentile among all judges statewide (marked “statewide”). The bars show that group; this judge is the purple mark. Under them: rank in the group and statewide across all courts. The survey grade (0–4) and response count come from the state’s report; the last line ranks the response count.

How the percentile is built