Bench Record
64percentile

Barry A. Schwartz

County Court · Denver County · retention evaluations: 2024, 2020

2024 retention · County Court · Denver County

Among 2024 county court judges

64 percentile · rank 17 of 47

composite 0100

Among all 2024 judges statewide

61 percentile · rank 42 of 107

composite 0100

Survey responses

25 46th percentile among peers · 32nd percentile statewide

671

Composite index 60.28 among peers (57.94 statewide): the mean of the three percentiles below. Rank orders by it.

Overall survey grade

3.30 of 4 · 58.51 percentile

2.103.80

Mean of category scores

3.37 of 4 · 64.89 percentile

2.173.75

Attorneys saying “meets standards”

85.00% 57.45 percentile

27.00%100.00%

Attorneys

Say “meets standards”
85.00%

Non-attorneys

Say “meets standards”
70.00%
Category scores (0–4) against county court peers
CategoryScorePeer medianPeer range (dot is this judge, line is the median)
Case Management3.70median 3.303.30
Application and Knowledge of Law3.20median 3.103.10
Communications3.40median 3.303.30
Diligence3.30median 3.303.30
Demeanor3.40median 3.303.30
Fairness3.20median 3.203.20

Commission: meets standards (5–0)

The Denver County Court Commission on Judicial Performance unanimously agrees by a vote of 5-0 that Honorable Judge Barry A. Schwartz MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. The Colorado statutory judicial performance criteria are integrity, legal knowledge, communication skills, judicial temperament, administrative performance, and service to the legal profession and the public.

Judge Schwartz has a reputation for being fair, kind and respectful. He prides himself on being well-prepared and on giving parties the opportunity to be fully heard. He shows care and concern for everyone in his courtroom, puts people at ease, and is able to see complicated situations from multiple viewpoints. He is working to ensure that his empathy for defendants does not convey favoritism, and he continues to work to improve his knowledge of criminal case law through research and consultation. He shows flexibility with virtual appearances. Outside of the courtroom, he volunteers at local law schools and high schools, speaks in classes, serves as a judge in mock trials, and participates in programs that promote civil education.

In evaluating Judge Schwartz, the commission used live, livestream and recorded courtroom observations, conducted a personal interview with the judicial officer, case management data and reviewed surveys from attorney and non-attorney courtroom participants, comments received from interested parties during the evaluation, and the judicial officer self-evaluation, with supporting documents when submitted, to inform its decision for meets/does not meet performance standards.

Judge Schwartz was appointed to the Denver County Court in 2017. He is a Denver native and earned his law degree from the University of Denver in 1988. Prior to his appointment, he served as a judicial clerk for two appellate judges and a federal magistrate and worked in private practice in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts across the country before becoming an Assistant Federal Public Defender and then Assistant City Attorney in Denver. Presently, he presides over criminal cases. Judge Schwartz is married with two grown children and a snarly old dog.

State evaluation page · 2024 survey report (PDF)

2020 retention · County Court · Denver County

Among 2020 county court judges

33 percentile · rank 24 of 37

composite 0100

Among all 2020 judges statewide

27 percentile · rank 73 of 100

composite 0100

Survey responses

80 98th percentile among peers · 97th percentile statewide

380

Composite index 36.94 among peers (32.00 statewide): the mean of the three percentiles below. Rank orders by it.

Overall survey grade

3.40 of 4 · 45.95 percentile

1.504.00

Mean of category scores

3.47 of 4 · 47.30 percentile

1.503.95

Attorneys saying “meets standards”

68.00% 17.57 percentile

0.00%100.00%

Attorneys

Say “meets standards”
68.00%

Non-attorneys

Say “meets standards”
95.00%
Category scores (0–4) against county court peers
CategoryScorePeer medianPeer range (dot is this judge, line is the median)
Case Management3.30median 3.503.50
Application and Knowledge of Law3.20median 3.303.30
Communications3.50median 3.603.60
Diligence3.40median 3.403.40
Demeanor3.50median 3.503.50
Fairness3.90median 3.903.90

Commission: meets standards Split vote 7–3

The Second Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance finds that the Honorable Barry A. Schwartz MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Seven members of the Commission voted that Judge Schwartz met judicial performance standards, while the other three members voted that he did not meet judicial performance standards.

After meeting with Judge Schwartz, and after reviewing his work, and after assessing feedback from attorneys and non-attorneys, the Commission was divided as to whether he meets judicial performance standards. Judge Schwartz is a new judge, the Commission had previously notified Judge Schwartz of concerns that he exhibits a bias in favor of parties who represent themselves, concerns about his application of the law, and concerns about inconsistent application of laws and rules. At the Commission’s request, Judge Schwartz recently started an improvement plan and has taken steps to improve as a Judge. But the Commission was divided over whether the proactive steps Judge Schwartz has taken to address and correct the behavior were sufficient. Based on all the aforementioned considerations, the Judicial Performance Commission encourages Judge Schwartz to continue with his performance plan and finds that Judge Schwartz meets performance standards.

The Commission conducted a personal interview with Judge Schwartz, reviewed orders he authored, observed him in court in person before the COVID-19 pandemic and through recordings, and reviewed survey responses from attorneys and non-attorneys who had experience with Judge Schwartz. Those surveyed were asked, “based on your responses to the previous questions related to the performance evaluation criteria, do you think Judge Schwartz meets judicial performance standards?” Of the 51 attorneys responding to the surveys, 68% believe that Judge Schwartz meets performance standards, 23% believe he does not meet performance standards, and 9% had no opinion. Judge Schwartz received ratings slightly below the statewide average among all County Court judges standing for retention with regard to the areas surveyed: (1) case management and (2) application and knowledge of law. Judge Schwartz received ratings slightly above the statewide average among all County Court judges standing for retention with regarding to the areas surveyed: (1) diligence, (2) demeanor, and (3) fairness. Of the 29 non-attorneys responding to the survey, 95% believe Judge Schwartz meets performance standards, 5% believe he does not. Mayor Hancock appointed Judge Schwartz to the Denver County Court in 2017. Before his appointment, he was a senior attorney in the litigation section of the Denver City Attorney’s office. His professional experience also includes serving four years as an attorney in the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Colorado and as an attorney in private practice. He earned a Bachelor of Arts at the University of Colorado and his Juris Doctor at the University of Denver. Judge Schwartz serves on the Colorado supreme court’s Board of Law Examiners and he volunteers at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law and with the East High School We the People constitutional law team and speech and debate program.

State evaluation page · 2020 survey report (PDF)