2024 retention · District Court · 20th Judicial District
35 percentile · rank 34 of 52
composite 0100
28 percentile · rank 76 of 107
composite 0100
58 91st percentile among peers · 91st percentile statewide
14112
Composite index 39.42 among peers (34.58 statewide): the mean of the three percentiles below. Rank orders by it.
3.20 of 4 · 48.08 percentile
2.303.80
3.18 of 4 · 44.23 percentile
2.273.80
77.00% 25.96 percentile
29.00%100.00%
Attorneys
- Say “meets standards”
- 77.00%
Non-attorneys
- Say “meets standards”
- 77.00%
| Category | Score | Peer median | Peer range (dot is this judge, line is the median) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case Management | 3.40median 3.30 | 3.30 | |
| Application and Knowledge of Law | 3.10median 3.10 | 3.10 | |
| Communications | 3.20median 3.30 | 3.30 | |
| Diligence | 3.40median 3.20 | 3.20 | |
| Demeanor | 3.00median 3.20 | 3.20 | |
| Fairness | 3.00median 3.10 | 3.10 |
Commission: meets standards (8–0)
The Twentieth Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance, by a vote of 8-0, finds that Judge Thomas Francis Mulvahill MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Two Commissioners recused themselves based on their prior service on the bench with Judge Mulvahill.
Judge Mulvahill has presided over all docket categories in the 20 th Judicial District during his 15 years on the bench. The Commission finds Judge Mulvahill to be highly organized, methodical, and no-nonsense. He is introspective about his strengths and weaknesses. He places fairness to the parties in his court over his ego and those of the attorneys. Judge Mulvahill makes a conscious effort to avoid complacency that might otherwise result from a lengthy tenure as a judge. He has a strong work ethic, is efficient, and keeps abreast of new developments in the law. He has developed objective standards and other processes that help him combat bias and ensure fairness. Judge Mulvahill’s peers and others working in the justice system value the consistency of his rulings and his knowledge of the law and judicial procedures.
The Commission on Judicial Performance evaluates judges on six standards: legal knowledge, communication, administrative performance, integrity, judicial temperament, and service to the legal profession. To evaluate Judge Mulvahill’s performance the Commission observed him in court, reviewed opinions he authored, considered his self-evaluation, held a public meeting to invite comments, and reviewed responses to a survey distributed to all persons who have appeared in his court. The Commission also conducted personal interviews with Judge Mulvahill, the Chief Judge, the District Attorney, and a representative of the Boulder defense bar.
Judge Mulvahill was appointed as a District Judge in October 2009. Prior to his appointment, he was the managing partner at Chambers Dansky & Mulvahill LLC, a litigation practice in downtown Denver. Before entering private practice, he was a Deputy District Attorney in the Denver District Attorney’s Office and the Chief Prosecutor/Deputy City Attorney in the Lakewood City Attorney’s Office. Judge Mulvahill graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law and St. John’s University. He regularly speaks to elementary school students about the court system and participates as a judge in mock trial competitions for high school and law students. He also assisted in the development and presentation of a three-part educational series on mediation services for elderly clients and volunteered with the Judges Fighting Hunger pinto bean project.
2018 retention · District Court · 20th Judicial District
50 percentile · rank 26 of 52
composite 0100
58 percentile · rank 54 of 128
composite 0100
58 34th percentile among peers · 38th percentile statewide
29158
Composite index 51.28 among peers (55.34 statewide): the mean of the three percentiles below. Rank orders by it.
3.72 of 4 · 82.69 percentile
2.963.81
3.50 of 4 · 52.88 percentile
2.913.86
77.00% 18.27 percentile
44.00%100.00%
Attorneys
- Overall grade
- 2.90
- Say “meets standards”
- 77.00%
Non-attorneys
- Overall grade
- 3.98
- Say “meets standards”
- 100.00%
| Category | Score | Peer median | Peer range (dot is this judge, line is the median) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case Management | 3.56median 3.49 | 3.49 | |
| Application and Knowledge of Law | 3.38median 3.43 | 3.43 | |
| Communications | 3.34median 3.58 | 3.58 | |
| Diligence | 3.47median 3.50 | 3.50 | |
| Demeanor | 3.25median 3.51 | 3.51 | |
| Fairness | 3.98median 3.59 | 3.59 |
Commission: meets standards (10–0)
The 20th Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance unanimously (10-0) finds that Judge Thomas Francis Mulvahill MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Judge Mulvahill was appointed to the District Court of the 20th Judicial District on September 16, 2009. Prior to his appointment, he was the managing partner at Chambers Dansky & Mulvahill LLC, a litigation practice in downtown Denver. Before entering private practice, he was a Deputy District Attorney in the Denver District Attorney’s Office and the Chief Prosecutor/Deputy City Attorney in the Lakewood City Attorney’s Office. Judge Mulvahill graduated from the University of Colorado School of Law and St. John’s University. Judge Mulvahill has contributed to the profession by establishing an internship program for law students. He volunteers with the Judges Fighting Hunger pinto bean project. Judge Mulvahill increases public confidence in the justice system by speaking to schools, civic organizations, and bar associations and he was recognized as the 2013 Judicial Officer of the Year. The Commission evaluated Judge Mulvahill based on the criteria set forth in state law (C.R.S. 13-5.5-107): integrity, legal knowledge, communication skills, judicial temperament, administrative performance, and service to the legal profession and the public. Each Commissioner observed Judge Mulvahill in his courtroom. Each Commissioner also reviewed Judge Mulvahill’s self-evaluation, samples of his rulings and orders, a report on his caseload, and anonymous results of qualitative surveys sent to people who appeared in his courtroom during 2017. The Commission met with the Chief Judge, the District Attorney, and the Chair of the Boulder Chapter of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar. The Commission held a public hearing on May 15, 2018, to gather input from the community. The Commission also interviewed Judge Mulvahill. Due to concerns about the limited number of survey responses, Commissioners gave less weight to the survey results. Of the 13 attorneys who responded to the survey, 77% said Judge Mulvahill meets performance standards. Of the 45 non-attorneys who responded to the survey, 100% said Judge Mulvahill meets performance standards. The Commission found that court observations (which for all Commissioners totaled 44 hours), meeting with various stakeholders, and interviewing Judge Mulvahill provided the best insights. During his current term, Judge Mulvahill has presided over a variety of cases including: domestic relations 40%, civil 25%, criminal law 15%, probate 10%, juvenile 5%, and mental health 5%. Respondents used two pages to list Judge Mulvahill’s strengths, which included great leadership qualities, approachability, fairness, efficiency, and impressive legal expertise. Judge Mulvahill has high expectations for himself and diligently seeks ways to improve. He maintains control over difficult proceedings by staying calm and professional. Judge Mulvahill gives each party a full, equal, and fair proceeding by applying a knowledgeable and evenhanded application of the law. Judge Mulvahill clearly enjoys his work. Based on the Commission’s overall evaluation, Judge Mulvahill has demonstrated that he meets or exceeds performance standards in all categories.