Bench Record
21percentile

Ann Gail Meinster

District Court · 1st Judicial District · retention evaluations: 2020

2020 retention · District Court · 1st Judicial District

Among 2020 district court judges

21 percentile · rank 47 of 59

composite 0100

Among all 2020 judges statewide

19 percentile · rank 81 of 100

composite 0100

Survey responses

30 33rd percentile among peers · 41st percentile statewide

1488

Composite index 25.71 among peers (25.33 statewide): the mean of the three percentiles below. Rank orders by it.

Overall survey grade

3.00 of 4 · 12.71 percentile

2.203.90

Mean of category scores

2.75 of 4 · 4.24 percentile

2.423.88

Attorneys saying “meets standards”

88.00% 60.17 percentile

39.00%100.00%

Attorneys

Say “meets standards”
88.00%

Non-attorneys

Say “meets standards”
25.00%
Category scores (0–4) against district court peers
CategoryScorePeer medianPeer range (dot is this judge, line is the median)
Case Management3.40median 3.603.60
Application and Knowledge of Law2.80median 3.403.40
Communications3.20median 3.503.50
Diligence3.00median 3.403.40
Demeanor3.10median 3.603.60
Fairness1.00median 4.004.00

Commission: meets standards (10–0)

The First Judicial District Commission on Judicial Performance unanimously agrees by a vote of 10-0 that Judge Ann Gail Meinster MEETS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

Judge Meinster almost exclusively handles juvenile cases, while outside of that are domestic relation cases. Her other major duty is supervising seven magistrates. Judge Meinster also works closely with the Department of Human Services regarding cases in which families face crises with addiction, dependency and neglect, custody, the foster care system, and delinquency. Judge Meinster faces self-represented parties on a more frequent basis; almost all others have court-appointed attorneys. Judge Meinster views her court as a problem-solving court and works collaboratively with all parties to resolve each case. Foremost, she works to protect children in the legal process, basing decisions on their best interest. She presides with an appropriate informality to make her courtroom environment seem more comfortable for the parents and children appearing before her. She has children’s art on her walls and has candy available. In her interview with the Commission and in observing her, she clearly demonstrated a genuine passion for the welfare of youth and families. In her evaluation, she was characterized as down to earth, someone who empathizes with all people.

The performance evaluation on Judge Meinster is based on many kinds of evidence, including a personal interview, courtroom observations, opinions she authored, comments received from interested parties, and survey responses. Regarding whether she met judicial performance standards from the survey, 88 percent of attorneys practicing before her said yes, 8 percent said no, and 4 percent had no opinion. By attorneys, her overall survey score of 3.0 was slightly under the average overall score for district judge at 3.4 on a 4.0 scale. Judge Meinster was rated by appellate judges slightly above other district court judges on overall performance.

Judge Meinster was appointed to the bench in October 2011. Previously, she had served as a district magistrate. Since her appointment, she has specialized in juvenile justice issues. She has been in juvenile law for about thirty years; it is her life work. She is a graduate of Mt. Holyoke College and received her law degree from the University of San Diego. Judge Meinster has been recognized with five awards for outstanding service. Judge Meinster’s community service includes: Executive Committee of the Court Improvement Program; Juvenile Rules Committee; within the First Judicial District, Chair of the Juvenile Services Planning Committee; the Best Practice Team, and the 1st Judicial Management Team. In addition, Judge Meinster regularly speaks at state and national professional forums. Judge Meinster was the first Colorado judge to receive the Child Welfare Law Specialist certification from the National Association of Counsel for Children and the American Bar Association. Her family treatment court was a 2020 nominee for the national Juvenile and Family Treatment Court Leadership Award.

State evaluation page · 2020 survey report (PDF)